|Yes, but they have propagandized themselves as the good guys.|
The DNC was served yesterday to give notice of a class action lawsuit for people who donated to the Democratic National Committee for Bernie Sanders by Beck and Lee Trial Lawyers. They are seeking damages for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, violation of a Washington D.C. code that as manifested by deceptive conduct of lying about being neutral towards candidates, unjust enrichment from donations that were fraudulently obtained, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence for failure to use reasonable care regarding the personal information of the donors.
The basis of the lawsuit is of course the lies that the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz were neutral on candidates when all along they planned to install Hillary Clinton as the candidate and president. It was actually demonstrated for months that this was true by their actions and the news media who sycophantically followed the DNC orders. Those of us who are conscious were shocked. Then when the hacked emails from the DNC hard drives were exposed by Guccufer 2.0 clear evidence made it very obvious that not only were they biased towards HRC, but they had decided long ago she would win the candidacy. It went way further than that, they designed a system of
This lawsuit is beautiful and designed to help the citizens of this country fight their way towards democracy, we do not have real elections in the United States. Only a fraction of those effected are on the lawsuit right now, thousands are lined up and ready to go behind them. #BernieWon
Here is the best part of the documents, the summons for the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
You can find the court documents on the JamPac website.
130. Despite the requirements in the Charter, and in spite of the multiple public
declarations of neutrality and impartiality with respect to the Democratic primary process, the
DNC was not neutral. To the contrary, the DNC was biased in favor of one candidate – Hillary
Clinton (“Clinton”) – from the beginning and throughout the process. The DNC devoted its
considerable resources to supporting Clinton above any of the other Democratic candidates.
Through its public claims to being neutral and impartial, the DNC actively concealed its bias
from its own donors as well as donors to the campaigns of Clinton’s rivals, including Bernie
137. By the date of the DNC Memo, the Democratic presidential nomination field
already included, in addition to Clinton, Bernie Sanders, who announced his candidacy on April
30, 2015.12 And at the time, there was also widespread speculation that others would soon enter
the primary race including Joe Biden, Lincoln Chafee, Martin O’Malley, Elizabeth Warren, and
138. Despite there being every indication that the 2016 Democratic primary would be
contested by multiple candidates, including Sanders, the DNC Memo makes no mention of any
Democratic candidate except Clinton, and builds the DNC’s election strategy on the assumption
that Clinton will be the nominee, with no doubts attached. Rather than reflecting an “impartial”
or “evenhanded” approach to the nominating process, as required by the Charter, the DNC
Memo strongly indicates that the DNC’s entire approach to the process was guided by the
singular goal of elevating Clinton to the general election contest.
Here is the PAC website with court documents and other information about the case, JAMPAC.
They are on FaceBook.
The video below is the serving of the DNC to give notice of the class action lawsuit.
Here is one of the lawyers involved, Jared H. Beck discussing the lawsuit, yes he is a Bernie supporter. I thank you and your law partner for this Mr. Beck.